Software Testing & QA Online Community > Detail: Skills are Only Half the Equation for Success
|A StickyMinds.com Original|
Skills are Only Half the Equation for Success
By Esther Derby
Summary: Managers work hard to hire the right people for the job. Yet sometimes, the work doesnít go as well as we think it should. Was it a bad hire? Has the person developed a bad attitude? Maybe, but before you jump to conclusions, look at the other half of the performance equation.
Many years ago, psychologist Kurt Lewin reduced the mysteries of human behavior to this simple statement:
B = É(P,E)
Behavior is a function of the Person and the Environment
Of course, itís not that simple. But I still find this notation useful, because it reminds me that the skills and abilities of the person arenít the only factors that contribute performance.
Much of the time, organizations focus on the Person part of the equation. Thatís important, because our work requires intelligent people with a wide range of functional skills, technical and domain knowledge, and appropriate interpersonal skills. Most managers work hard to hire the right people. Managers also provide coaching and feedback to help people hone their skills and develop their capabilities.
But thatís only half the equation.
Organizational factors, corporate culture, policies, and the direct work environment influence performance, too. The good news is that you can influence the environment for your group in ways that increase performance.
Are You Creating an Environment for Success?
Letís assume that youíve hired bright, capable people who have the appropriate skills and qualities for the job. They have the technical skills the job demands, they know the domain, and theyíre familiar with the product. Yet the work isnít going as well as you think it should. Maybe itís the environment, not the person. Look at these areas to see if you can improve the environment for success.
People need to know what the priorities are. Managers donít (and canít) make all the decisions about how work is done. Managers need to establish clear priorities so that the people closest to the work can make good decisions. Communicate a clear mission and ensure that each person understands his top-three priorities. People perform better when they understand the mission of the group and whatís most important.
People canít do their best without the right tools for the job. But hardware and tools, of course, arenít the only resources people need. They need time, access to expertise, and training. No one I know can manufacture time, but setting clear priorities and keeping the workload reasonable reduce the sense of overwhelming demands. When budgets are tight, find inexpensive ways to feed the need for training and expertise. Offer to buy books for a lunchtime study group and support access to content websites and other free sources of information.
People desire respect. Every once in a while I hear a manager assert that people work best when theyíre a little afraid. I donít buy that. Show respect by keeping promises, communicating openly, and listening to other peopleís ideas. Donít take phone calls and pages or check email during meetings, especially one-on-one meetings.
People want challenging work. Make work assignments based on interests, or better yet, work with your team to have them self-organize. That way, people will have a chance to choose work that appeals to them. Now, every group has some scut work. Rather than assign that to one unfortunate person, rotate responsibility for the work no one really enjoys, but everyone recognizes is necessary.
People want recognition and appreciation. Iím not talking rewards here, monetary or otherwise. Humans crave genuine acknowledgement for their contributions at workóboth concrete accomplishments and the intangible ways they contribute to the spirit and success of the group. Let people know that you notice and appreciate them every week. I donít think saying ďthank youĒ or ďgood jobĒ is good enough. I like to address the person directly, like this: ďDon, I appreciate you for shipping that data update on time. It makes a big difference to our clients.Ē
Are There Environmental Roadblocks Stifling Performance?
Suppose youíve done all of these things (and more) to establish an environment for success. Your work is not done.
Corporate culture and norms are part of the environment and so are policies, procedures, measures, and reward systems. Examine the organizational environment to see if there are other obstacles that keep people from doing their best.
Are there factors that actually punish people for doing a good job? I once worked with a support group that was having a crisis in customer satisfaction. Support agents were expected to meet certain targets for the length of calls.That worked fine with simple problems, but when a tough problem that took more than a minute or two to fix came along, it was a problem. The measure actually punished people who went the extra mile for the customer and stayed on the phone long past the allotted time. These folks had the knowledge and skills to perform, but an environmental factor (a poorly designed measure) was in the way.
Sometimes policies and procedures are the culprit in stifling performance. One organization I know of requires bi-weekly budget reporting and forecasting. It can take up to seven working days to assemble all the bits of information needed to create a report. The procedure is difficult and frustrating, and the time people spend every month on budgets means they arenít doing other valuable work. In another group, each team member is required to provide written feedback to every other team member every quarter. It wasnít so bad when there were five team members, but now that there are twenty people in the groupÖ well, you can do the math.
Pile on enough environmental roadblocks and people become frustrated and cynical. And frustrated, cynical people are less likely to do a good job.
Individual managers canít always change measurement systems, policies, and procedures. Insulate your group where you can and put the rest in context.
Remember that an individualís skills and abilities arenít the only factors in performance. Managers need to attend to both the person and the environment when assessing performance. Donít wait until the next performance evaluation season rolls around. Evaluate the work environment now. Does the management infrastructure enable high performance? Are you working to remove or reduce the obstacles that are hampering performance? What else can you do to create an environment for success?
About the Author
Esther Derby works with project teams and managers to overcome the obstacles they face building software. She also coaches technical people making the transition to management and is one of the founders of the AYE Conference. You can read more of Estherís musings on the wonderful world of software at www.estherderby.com and on her weblog Her email is email@example.com.
Back to Top